ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024
Safety of urgent surgery for the patients with proximal femur fracture treated with platelet aggregation inhibitors: a propensity-score matching analysis.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative Anemia and Transfusion Management in Older Adults with Osteoporotic Hip Fractures: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Emerging Strategies.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo compare the various perioperative outcomes in an urgent surgery setting among patients with proximal femur fracture (PFF) who received platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAIs) and those who did not.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 1,838 patients who underwent surgery for PFF between January 2011 and January 2021. We conducted 1:1 propensity-score matching and compared the perioperative outcomes, including operation time, postoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality, and variables related to bleeding risk (e.g., number of transfusion profiles, hemoglobin levels, and laboratory data, including coagulation battery).
resultsOf the 492 patients who were treated with PAIs, 484 were 1:1 matched to the untreated control group. The PAI group showed shorter operation time than the matched control group (72.3 min for PAI vs. 77.7 min for control; P = 0.041), and the control group showed more pulmonary thromboembolism (0.2% for PAI vs 1.7% for control; P = 0.046) than the PAI group. The other complications and length of hospital stay, mortality rate, transfusion profile, and the laboratory test (except preoperative international normalized ratio, INR) showed no significant difference between the groups. Subgroup analyses of the patients treated with only aspirin (aspirin: 306, matched control: 306), only clopidogrel (clopidogrel: 100, matched control: 100), and others who were treated with dual anticoagulation (dual anticoagulation: 78, matched control: 78) showed no significant differences in perioperative outcomes among the groups.
conclusionThe patients who were treated with PAI could undergo PFF surgery safely without delay, which led to no significant difference in operation time, postoperative complication risk, perioperative blood transfusion, and variables related to bleeding risk. Therefore, we believe that it is unnecessary to delay surgery for patients with PFF who receive PAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37768385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.