Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767550›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2024

Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab or obinutuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a phase Ib/II study.

Christopher R Flowers, Matthew J Matasar, Alex F Herrera, Mark Hertzberg, Sarit Assouline, Judit Demeter, Andrew McMillan, Amitkumar Mehta, Stephen Opat, Marek Trnňný and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Cell-of-Origin Subtype Predicts Response to Polatuzumab Vedotin in Large B-cell Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Christopher R FlowersWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA. CRFlowers@mdanderson.org.
Matthew J MatasarMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Alex F HerreraCity of Hope Medical Centre, Duarte, CA.
Mark HertzbergPrince of Wales Hospital and University of NSW, Sydney.
Sarit AssoulineJewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC.
Judit DemeterSemmelweiss University, Budapest, Hungary.
Andrew McMillanCenter for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham.
Amitkumar MehtaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
Stephen OpatClinical Haematology, Monash Health and Monash University, Clayton.
Marek TrnňnýCharles University General Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lisa MusickGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Jamie HirataGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Annie YangGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Laurie H SehnBC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Charles University · CZCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USEmory University · USJewish General Hospital · CAMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMonash Health · AUNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSemmelweis University · HUSpinal Cord Injury BC · CAUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Despite treatment advances that have improved outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL, many patients still die from progressive disease or treatment-related toxicities. In the phase Ib/II GO29365 study (clinicaltrials.gov 02257567), the safety and efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola-BR) versus bendamustine and rituximab (BR) alone, and polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and obinutuzumab (Pola-BG) as a single-arm cohort were evaluated in patients with R/R FL. Following the phase Ib safety run-in, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Pola-BR or BR alone in the phase II stage; a separate non-randomized Pola-BG cohort was examined in the phase Ib/II expansion stage. Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability (phase Ib) and positron emission tomography complete response (PET-CR) rate by independent review committee (phase II). Overall, 112 patients were enrolled (phase Ib safety run-in: Pola-BR, N=6; phase II randomized cohort: Pola-BR, N=39; BR, N=41; phase Ib/II expansion cohort: Pola-BG, N=26). PET-CR rates were 66.7% (phase Ib safety run-in, Pola-BR); 69.2% (phase II randomized, Pola-BR); 63.4% (phase II randomized, BR); and 65.4% (phase Ib/II expansion Pola-BG). There was a higher occurrence of cytopenias with Pola-BR and Pola-BG than with BR; serious adverse events were more frequent with Pola-BR (61.4%) and Pola-BG (46.2%) than with BR (29.3%). Overall, this analysis does not demonstrate a benefit of adding Pola to BR or BG regimens for patients with R/R FL.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunoconjugatesLymphoma, FollicularLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBendamustine HydrochlorideHumansRituximabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBendamustine HydrochlorideImmunoconjugatesobinutuzumabpolatuzumab vedotinRituximab

Identifiers

PMID37767550
PMCPMC10985435
OpenAlexW4387114848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.