Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767527›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2023

Approaching the Families of Potential Deceased Organ Donors: An Overview of Regulations and Practices in Council of Europe Member States.

Sándor Mihály, Anikó Smudla, Beatriz Dominguez-Gil, Alicia Pérez, Francesco Procaccio, Emanuele Cozzi, Marta López Fraga, Danica Avsec, Axel Rahmel, John Forsythe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sándor MihályHungarian National Blood Transfusion Service, Budapest, Hungary.
Anikó SmudlaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatriz Dominguez-GilOrganización Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain.
Alicia PérezOrganización Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain.
Francesco ProcaccioNational Transplant Centre, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele CozziThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Marta López FragaEuropean Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM), Strasbourg, France.
Danica AvsecInstitute for Transplantation of Organs and Tissues of the Republic of Slovenia, Slovenija-Transplant, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Axel RahmelDeutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
John ForsytheNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Franz ImmerSwisstransplant, National Foundation for Organ Donation and Transplantation, Bern, Switzerland.
Janis JushinskisLatvian Transplantation Centre, Riga, Latvia.
Alex ManaraThe Intensive Care Unit, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to describe regulations and practices concerning the family approach to discuss donation, specifically after the neurological determination of death, one of the most challenging steps in the donation pathway. A secondary objective was to assess the impact of legislation on consent rates for organ donation. The Council of Europe surveyed 39 member states about national regulations, practices, and consent rates; 34 replied. Opt-out legislation is present in 19, opt-in in 9 and a mixed system in six countries. An opt-out register is kept by 24 countries and an opt-in register by 18 countries, some keeping both. The mean consent rate was 81.2% of all family approaches. Most countries regulate how death using neurological criteria is confirmed (85.3%), while regulation of other aspects of the deceased donation pathway varies: the timing of informing the family about brain death (47.1%) and organ donation (58.8%), the profile of professional who discusses both topics with the family (52.9% and 64.7%, respectively) and the withdrawal of treatment after brain death (47.1%). We also noted a mismatch between what regulations state and what is done in practice in most countries. We suggest possible reasons for this disparity.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementBrain DeathEuropeHumansTissue Donorsconsent for organ donationCouncil of Europedeceased organ donationfamily approachfamily communication

Identifiers

PMID37767527
PMCPMC10520243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.