ArticleHeliyon2023
Performance and applications of lightweight geopolymer and alkali activated composites with incorporation of ceramic, polymeric and lignocellulosic wastes as aggregates: A review.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical Behaviour of Geopolymer Concretes with Foamed Geopolymer and Lightweight Mineral Aggregates for Chimney Flue Elements.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Experimental Investigation of the Drying Shrinkage Performance of a Modified Ceramsite Geopolymer Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Preparation of Geopolymeric Materials from Industrial Kaolins, with Variable Kaolinite Content and Alkali Silicates Precursors.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Synthesis of Electrolytic Manganese Slag-Solid Waste-Based Geopolymers: Compressive Strength and Mn Immobilization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the construction industry moves towards greater sustainability, the application of more durable and environmentally friendly materials, capable of providing comfort in buildings and infrastructure, is a key element to consider. In this context, the use of alkali-activated binders (AAB) and geopolymers (GP), which have a lower carbon footprint than ordinary Portland cement (OPC), has emerged as an important alternative. Moreover, the addition of waste-based lightweight aggregates (LWA) to AAB and GP matrices produces lightweight composites that offer enhanced mechanical performance and improved comfort as building materials, while offering an alternative use to the increasing number of waste materials from diverse sources. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature on the above-mentioned topics (waste LWA in an AAB/GP matrix) published between 2012 and 2023, mainly indexed in the Scopus database. The waste-based LWA reported in the literature were categorized, and their properties and morphology presented. Then, the influence of the size, quantity, and nature of the LWA on the composite's properties and performance was analyzed. Fresh state performance, mechanical performance, density, and thermal and acoustic insulation were considered. This review is complemented by a bibliometric analysis, where keyword correlation and co-authorship networks on this field are established. The review highlights the potential of cementitious composites including waste-based LWA as a sustainable building material for structural and non-structural applications. However, more studies are required to further understand the behaviour of these composites under innovative manufacturing processes, such as extrusion and 3D printing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.