ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Urinary incontinence prevalence and factors associated with patients talking with doctors about urine control.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of Dementia Among Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Urinary Incontinence.Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Educating the future: Serbian healthcare students' knowledge and attitudes toward urinary incontinence.BMC medical education · 2025Observational
- Factors Influencing the Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Women and its Impact on Sexual Quality of Life.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Patient perceptions of their doctors may influence talking to them about urinary incontinence (UI). We estimated prevalence of UI among Medicare beneficiaries and assessed association between beneficiaries' demographic and clinical characteristics and whether they spoke to their doctor about UI and association between beneficiaries' perceptions of their doctor and whether they spoke to their doctor about UI. Methods: This study was approved by the Purdue University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and determined exempt, category 4 (protocol number 1907022503, approval on August 5th, 2019). Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) 2016 data were analyzed. Beneficiaries who indicated that they lost urine control 2-3 times a month or above were classified as experiencing UI. An 11-item patient perception of their physician scale was created based on MCBS items. Perceptions were categorized as favorable or unfavorable. SAS version 9.4 for Unix was used for all analyses. PROC LOGISTIC was used to assess multi-variable association between beneficiaries' perceptions of their doctors and talking to their doctor about UI. Results: Among 7466 persons meeting inclusion criteria, 1856 (24.9%) had UI. The perception of doctor scale scores ranged from 15 to 44, with mean score = 36.57 (standard deviation = 5.29). The scale Cronbach alpha reliability was 0.93. Using sensitivity and receiver operating characteristic analysis, a cutoff of 30 or higher was identified as a favorable perception. Beneficiaries with favorable perceptions of their doctor were more likely to speak to their doctor about experiencing UI than beneficiaries with unfavorable perceptions (odds ratio = 1.55, 95% confidence interval = 1.03 to 2.35, Conclusion: Overall, the more favorable the perception of their physicians, the more likely beneficiaries were to speak to them about their UI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.