ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Evaluation of community-based care delivered by primary healthcare providers in management of hypertension in a rural area of West Bengal.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of population-based sodium reduction interventions on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lifestyle modifications and medication compliance are key strategies. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of community-based care delivered by trained primary healthcare providers in management of hypertension. Materials and Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted between two groups of newly diagnosed hypertensive patients to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention. Six blocks in a district were chosen with pairwise matching. All primary healthcare providers of one block in each pair were randomized to receive the intervention and the other was controlled. Next screening for risk factors, detection of hypertension, counseling, and follow-up care were provided. The patients within the control group received usual care as per clinician's discretion. A total of 227 patients in the "study" group and 230 patients in the "control" group were recruited from 12 subcenters selected randomly. Data analysis was done by χ Results: Patients in the intervention blocks demonstrated a statistically significant mean reduction in SBP of 16.14 ± 0.82 and DBP by 11.65 ± 0.53 compared to 9.83 ± 1.02 and 7.68 ± 0.66, respectively, in the control blocks after adjusting for age, sex, and baseline blood pressure at one-year follow-up. Regarding lifestyle-related cardiovascular risk factors, statistically significant differences were found in favor of the intervention group. Conclusion: The study supports and reinforces the utilization of trained primary healthcare providers under the NPCDCS program in screening and promoting blood pressure control by preventive services to hypertensive patients in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.