Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767331›Full record

ArticleBone reports2023

Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of cranial sutures - A novel approach to quantitative analysis.

Ross Remesz, Tsolmonbaatar Khurelbaatar, Karyne N Rabey, Michael R Doschak, Dan L Romanyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ross RemeszDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Tsolmonbaatar KhurelbaatarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Karyne N RabeyDivision of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Michael R DoschakFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Dan L RomanykDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Differences in complexity of cranial suture forms on the endocranial (i.e., deep) and ectocranial (i.e., superficial) skull surfaces have been noted in the literature, indicating through thickness three-dimensional (3D) suture variability depending on the chosen section and necessity for considering the complete 3D structure in many cases. This study aims to evaluate the variability of suture morphology through the skull thickness using a rat model, and to provide more robust metrics and methodologies to analyze suture morphology. Design: X-ray micro-computed tomographic (μCT) imaging methods were utilized in order to provide internal structure information. Methods were developed to isolate and analyze sutures widths and linear interdigitation index (LII) values on each adjacent offset transverse plane of the μCT datasets. LII was defined as the curved path length of the suture divided by the linear length between the ends of the region of interest. Scans were obtained on 15 female rats at ages of 16, 20, and 24 weeks ( Results: 3D variability in local suture widths within individuals, as well as through thickness variabilities in planar widths and LII was observed. Kruskal-Wallis tests for bulk through thickness averaged suture widths and LII were found to be statistically insignificant, despite clear geometric differences through suture thicknesses. Conclusion: Although the bulk morphometric variability between age groups was found to be statistically insignificant, the 3D variability within individuals point to the importance of analyzing suture form using 3D metrics when studying suture development, response to functional activity, or morphometry in general.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyCranial sutureImage analysisLinear interdigitation indexMorphology

Identifiers

PMID37767331
PMCPMC10520544
OpenAlexW4386879866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.