ReviewCureus2023
Comparison of the Efficacy of Vaginal Hyaluronic Acid to Estrogen for the Treatment of Vaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyaluronic acid for vaginal health and quality of life in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
- Rose Stem Cell-Derived Exosome-Hyaluronic Acid Therapy for Recurrent Atrophic Vaginitis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Topical Spermidine Hyaluronate (Spd-HA) in Vulvovaginal Atrophy: A Preliminary Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Development of a Vaginal Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel for Combating Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topical estrogen is effective for treating postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. However, there is a potential risk of estrogen-related adverse effects. There is a need for finding effective non-hormonal treatment for vaginal atrophy. The topical application of moisturising agents, such as hyaluronic acid (HA), represents a promising non-hormonal treatment for the relief of vaginal atrophy. This study aimed to summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy of topical HA compared to topical estrogen in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy. The literature search covered English-published studies from database inception till February 2023. The search included the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Scopus, using the terms "Hyaluronic Acid" AND "Postmenopause" AND "Vagina" AND "Atrophy". Due to the diversity in reporting outcomes, meta-analysis was not feasible. A narrative synthesis with a systematic approach was conducted by vote counting of studies that included a direct comparison between topical HA and topical estrogen. Six studies were included. Intra-group comparisons showed that both interventions were significantly effective in alleviating the symptoms of vaginal atrophy and dyspareunia as well as improving vaginal pH and cell maturation index. However, inter-group comparisons in most studies showed that estrogen was superior to HA in relieving vaginal symptoms and improving vaginal pH, dyspareunia, and the cell maturation index. There is no evidence to show the superiority of HA to estrogen in the treatment of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. However, the therapeutic efficacy of HA seems to be comparable to estrogen and considering its safety, HA can be used as an alternative to estrogen in patients who do not want to use estrogen. The available studies have several limitations, and the reporting of outcomes was considerably heterogeneous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.