Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767244›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

The Role of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Muscle Injuries: A Systematic Review.

Yuriy Mazin, Carolina Lemos, Carolina Paiva, Luís Amaral Oliveira, Andre Borges, Tiago Lopes

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Regenerative rehabilitation: the effects of physical factors on regeneration].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Yuriy MazinPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro de Reabilitação do Norte, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT.
Carolina LemosPopulation Studies, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, PRT.
Carolina PaivaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro-Rovisco Pais, Coimbra, PRT.
Luís Amaral OliveiraPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro de Reabilitação do Norte, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT.
Andre BorgesPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar De Trás-Os-Montes E Alto Douro, Vila Real, PRT.
Tiago LopesPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro de Reabilitação do Norte, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT.
Centro de Medicina de Reabilitacao do Alcoitão · PTCentro Hospitalar de Trás os Montes e Alto Douro · PTPopulation Council · INPopulation Services International · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle injuries commonly occur in sports and can be classified as indirect and direct, according to the 2013 Munich Consensus Statement (MCS). Since recent evidence suggests that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) improves muscular microcirculation and may increase regeneration after acute muscle injury, we performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines to access the efficacy and safety of ESWT in the treatment of patients with muscle injuries. PubMed and Cochrane were searched to screen for potentially relevant articles and the literature search was last updated in June 2023. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or case controls published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish that studied the effect of ESWT on indirect and direct muscle injuries in individuals aged ≥18, with at least one of the following reported outcomes: pain on the visual analog scale (VAS), functionality assessed either with disability scales or subjectively, time for return to play (RTP), re-injury rate, and ultrasonographic evaluation. The exclusion criteria were literature reviews, systematic reviews, studies in animals, studies in other languages, studies that failed to meet the targeted population or intervention and studies that didn't report any of the outcomes of interest. The quality of the studies was analyzed using the Cochrane Assessment Tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Eight studies were included in the systematic review (two randomized controlled trials, one prospective observational study, two retrospective observational studies, and three case reports), with a total of 143 adult participants. ESWT was associated with less pain on VAS, better function, reduction of size of lesion on ultrasound evaluation, faster RTP and/or lower re-injury rate in patients with indirect and direct muscle injuries and muscular hematomas, a frequent secondary complication of muscle injuries. The evidence regarding the use of ESWT for these types of injuries is therefore promising. Nevertheless, higher-quality studies are needed in the future to prove its efficacy, better comprehend its mechanisms of action and define treatment protocols (timing, type and parameters of ESWT).

Indexed as

delayed onset muscle sorenessextracorporeal shock wave therapymuscle injuriesmuscular hematomastendinous injuries

Identifiers

PMID37767244
PMCPMC10521343
OpenAlexW4386203819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.