ArticleMethodsX2023
Broadly applicable methods for the detection of artefacts in electroencephalography acquired simultaneously with hemodynamic recordings.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) data, acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), must be corrected for artefacts related to MR gradient switches (GS) and the cardioballistic (CB) effect. Canonical approaches require additional signal acquisition for artefact detection (e.g., MR volume onsets, ECG), without which the EEG data would be rendered uncleanable from these artefacts.•We present two broadly applicable methods for artefact detection based on peak detection combined with temporal constraints with respect to periodicity directly from the EEG data itself; no additional signals are required. We validated the performance of our methods versus the two canonical approaches for detection of GS/CB artefact, respectively, on 26 healthy human EEG-functional MRI resting-state datasets. Utilising various performance metrics, we found our methods to perform as well as - and sometimes better than - the canonical standard approaches. With as little as one EEG channel recording, our methods can be applied to detect GS/CB artefacts in EEG data acquired simultaneously with MRI in the absence of MR volume onsets and/or an ECG recording. The detected artefact onsets can then be fed into the standard artefact correction software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.