Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767068›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2023

IMbrave150: Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Exploratory Analysis of the Phase III Study.

Masatoshi Kudo, Richard S Finn, Peter R Galle, Andrew X Zhu, Michel Ducreux, Ann-Lii Cheng, Masafumi Ikeda, Kaoru Tsuchiya, Ken-Ichi Aoki, Jing Jia and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. AI-assisted ascites volumetry for prognostic stratification in HCC treated with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Richard S FinnDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Peter R GalleDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Andrew X ZhuMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michel DucreuxDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Paris-Saclay University, Inserm U1279, Villejuif, France.
Ann-Lii ChengDepartment of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Masafumi IkedaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Kaoru TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken-Ichi AokiChugai Pharmaceutical Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Jing JiaHoffmann-La Roche Limited, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Riccardo LencioniUniversity of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Harvard University · USInserm · FRJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKindai University · JPMusashino Red Cross Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWRoche (Canada) · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The phase III IMbrave150 study established atezolizumab + bevacizumab as standard of care in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This exploratory analysis reports efficacy and safety results in patients with baseline Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B disease. Methods: Patients with systemic treatment-naive unresectable HCC and Child-Pugh class A liver function were randomized 2:1 to receive 1,200 mg of atezolizumab plus 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab or 400 mg of sorafenib. Co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review facility (IRF)-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 in the BCLC stage B subgroup. Patients in this analysis had BCLC stage B disease at baseline per electronic case report form. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR) and change in the sum of longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions from baseline per IRF RECIST 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC. Results: Of 501 enrolled patients, 74 (15%) had BCLC stage B disease at baseline (atezolizumab + bevacizumab, Discussion/Conclusion: Efficacy benefits were observed with atezolizumab + bevacizumab in patients with baseline BCLC stage B disease, consistent with the intention-to-treat population.

Indexed as

AtezolizumabBarcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage BBevacizumabUnresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37767068
PMCPMC10521324
OpenAlexW4310183164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.