Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767011›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2023

Laboratory diagnostics for primary spinal infections in pediatric and adult populations: a narrative review.

Romain Dayer, Giacomo De Marco, Oscar Vazquez, Anne Tabard-Fougère, Blaise Cochard, Nathaly Gavira, Giorgio Di Laura Frattura, Nastassia Guanziroli Pralong, Christina Steiger, Dimitri Ceroni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Spinal infections.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic imaging confusion in infectious spondylitis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Spinal infections: What is new in 2023.North American Spine Society journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Romain DayerPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Giacomo De MarcoPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Oscar VazquezPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Anne Tabard-FougèrePediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Blaise CochardPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Nathaly GaviraPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Giorgio Di Laura FratturaPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Nastassia Guanziroli PralongPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Christina SteigerPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Dimitri CeroniPediatric Orthopedics Unit, Pediatric Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary spinal infection (PSI) is a generic term covering a heterogeneous group of infections that can affect the vertebral body, intervertebral disks, the content of the medullary cavity, and adjacent paraspinal tissues. Patients' characteristics can vary significantly, notably according to their age, and some of these characteristics undoubtedly play a primordial role in the occurrence of a PSI and in the type of offending pathogen. Before approaching the subject of laboratory diagnostics, it is essential to define the characteristics of the patient and their infection, which can then guide the physician toward specific diagnostic approaches. This review critically examined the roles and usefulness of traditional and modern laboratory diagnostics in supporting clinicians' decision-making in cases of pediatric and adult primary spinal infection (PSI). It appears impossible to compare PSIs in children and adults, whether from an epidemiological, clinical, bacteriological, or biological perspective. The recipients are really too different, and the responsible germs are closely correlated to their age. Secondly, the interpretation of traditional laboratory blood tests appears to contribute little guidance for clinicians attempting to diagnose a PSI. Biopsy or needle aspiration for bacterial identification remains a controversial subject, as the success rates of these procedures for identifying causative organisms are relatively uncertain in pediatric populations.Using nucleic acid amplification assays (NAAAs) on biopsy samples has been demonstrated to be more sensitive than conventional cultures for diagnosing PSI. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) are particularly interesting for establishing a microbiological diagnosis of a PSI when standard cultures and NAAAs have failed to detect the culprit. We can even imagine that plasma metagenomic NGS using plasma (known as "liquid biopsy") is a diagnostic approach that can detect not only pathogens circulating in the bloodstream but also those causing focal infections, and thus eliminate the need for source sample collection using costly invasive surgical procedures.

Indexed as

AdultDiagnosticsLaboratoryNarrative reviewPediatricPrimary spinal infection

Identifiers

PMID37767011
PMCPMC10520565
OpenAlexW4386074767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.