Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767004›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2023

New records of moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae) for the Dutch Fauna.

Santiago Jaume-Schinkel, Gunnar Mikalsen Kvifte, Iva Njunjić, Menno Schilthuizen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Santiago Jaume-SchinkelMuseum Koenig, Bonn, Germany Museum Koenig Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-9407
Gunnar Mikalsen KvifteNord University, Steinkjer, Norway Nord University Steinkjer Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3210-5857
Iva NjunjićNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5723-4068
Menno SchilthuizenNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6229-0347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior to this study, the moth flies in The Netherlands were represented by 61 species. Our findings derive from a citizen-science expedition in the Vondelpark in Amsterdam, one of the oldest public parks and best known parks in The Netherlands. The combination of citizen science and the exploration of a well-known urban park has allowed us to contribute to the knowledge of moth fly species present in The Netherlands. The findings from this study provide valuable insights into the distribution, taxonomy and genetic resources of New information: Our study provides two new geographical records of the moth flies in The Netherlands, namely,

Indexed as

citizen scienceCOI barcodingdark taxaPsychodinaeTaxon Expeditions

Identifiers

PMID37767004
PMCPMC10520726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.