ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Improved Prediction of Knee Osteoarthritis by the Machine Learning Model XGBoost.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current and emerging therapies for knee osteoarthritis: From conventional approaches to machine learning and stem cell innovations.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- Regression analysis and validation of risk factors for upper limb dysfunction following modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- From COVID-19 to monkeypox: a novel predictive model for emerging infectious diseases.BioData mining · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The accurate prediction of osteoarthritis (OA) severity in patients can be helpful to make the proper decision of intervention. This study aims to build up a powerful model to assess predictive risk factors and severity of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in the clinical scenario. Methods: A total of 4796 KOA cases and 1205 features were selected by feature selections from the public OA database, Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Six machine learning-based models were constructed and compared for the accuracy of OA prediction. The gradient-boosting decision tree was used to identify important prediction features in the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model. The performance of models was evaluated by F1-score. Results: Twenty features were determined as predictors for KOA risk and severity, including the subject characteristics, knee symptoms/risk factors and physical exam. The XGBoost model demonstrated 100% prediction accuracy for 54.7% of examined samples, and the remaining 45.3% of samples showed Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) gradings very close to the actual levels. It showed the highest prediction accuracy with an F1-score of 0.553 among the tested six models. Conclusions: We demonstrate that the XGBoost is the best model for the prediction of KOA severity in the six examined models. In addition, 20 risk features were determined as the essential predictors of KOA, including the physical exam, knee symptoms/risk factors and subject characteristics, which may be useful for the identification of high-risk KOA cases and for making appropriate treatment decisions as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.