Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37766892›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2023

Assessing lignocellulosic biomass as a source of emergency foods.

Niroshan Siva, Charles T Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niroshan SivaDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Charles T AndersonDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catastrophes such as a nuclear war would generate atmospheric soot and reduce sunlight, making it difficult to grow crops. Under such conditions, people might turn to inedible plant biomass for nutrition, but the convertibility and nutritional content of this biomass have not been rigorously analyzed. We found that if plant biomass were converted into food at 30% efficiency, 6.7 kg of biomass per day would yield adequate carbohydrates, but contain potentially toxic or insufficient levels of other nutrients for a family of four. Therefore, exploiting biomass with low mineral content for carbohydrates and consuming other sources of protein, fat, and vitamins such as edible insects/single-cell proteins and vitamin supplements could provide a balanced diet in a global catastrophic environment.

Indexed as

Biomass conversionEmergency foodGlobal catastropheNutritional requirementPlant biomass

Identifiers

PMID37766892
PMCPMC10520305
OpenAlexW4386776041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.