Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37766817›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2023

Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety.

Ayeong Jenny Kim, Edina Szabo, Claire E Lunde, Gabriela Comptdaer, David Zurakowski, Christine B Sieberg, Scott A Holmes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayeong Jenny KimDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Edina SzaboDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Claire E LundeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Gabriela ComptdaerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
David ZurakowskiDepartments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Christine B SiebergDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Scott A HolmesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard University · USCenter for Pain and the Brain · USBoston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Acquisition of a Siemens 3T MRI for Research ImagingS10OD025111 · OD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WARFIELD, SIMON K · 2018 to 2018
$2.0M
NIH HHS S10 OD025111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is often used to understand the perceptual basis of acute and chronic conditions, including pain. As the need grows for developing a mechanistic understanding of neurological pathways underlying perception in the basic and clinical sciences, there is a greater need to adapt techniques such as QST to the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. No studies have yet evaluated the impact of the MR environment on the perception of thermal stimuli. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in temperature sensitivity outside an MR environment and during an MRI scanning session. We hypothesized that there would be a difference in how participants reported their pain sensitivity between the two environments. Methods: Healthy participants underwent thermal QST outside the MR scanning environment, where they were asked to rate the temperature of a noxious stimulus at which they perceived their pain to be 7/10, using a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10. Participants repeated this procedure inside a 3.0 T MRI approximately 30 min later. We repeated our investigation in a clinical cohort of participants with a chronic pain condition. Results: There were statistically significant changes of 1.1°C in thermal sensitivity between environments. This increase in pain threshold was found in healthy participants and replicated in the clinical cohort. Discussion: Findings can be applied toward improving MR safety, the resolution of brain pathways underlying pain mechanisms, and to more broadly comment on the impact of the MR environment on investigations that integrate perception-influenced processes.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingMR safetypainquantitative sensory testingthermal sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID37766817
PMCPMC10520956
OpenAlexW4386714474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.