ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2023
A 6-Month Follow-up Study on Adherence and Satisfaction with Lower Limb Prostheses and Orthoses Delivered to Community-Dwelling People in Japan.
Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Introduction: We aimed to evaluate adherence and satisfaction with prostheses and orthoses (POs) of the lower extremities delivered to community-dwelling patients and to assess the relationship of adherence and satisfaction with patient background factors, including medical status, physical findings, and level of participation. Methods: : We conducted a descriptive cohort study. Consecutive patients with disability who applied for lower extremity POs were invited to enroll. The patients' background information was collected at enrolment, and they were asked at 6 months after PO delivery whether they were using their PO as expected prior to its delivery, and, on a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0 - 10), if they were satisfied with their POs. Furthermore, the relationship between usage/satisfaction and the participants' backgrounds was evaluated and the participants' comments regarding their POs were summarized. Results: : This study analyzed the data of 51 participants (mean age, 56.5 ± 19 years). At the 6-month follow-up, 45 participants used POs as much as they had expected before delivery; this group was younger than their counterparts (52.7 versus 69.2 years). The median satisfaction score using the NRS was 8.5. Older participants (r = - 0.33), participants who were able to attach and remove their POs, and those who were independent in locomotion scored lower on satisfaction. Other background factors were not different regarding adherence or satisfaction. Conclusions: : This study demonstrated the difficulty in predicting the usage and satisfaction with lower limb POs from users' backgrounds. Producer-user communication, particularly with patients of older age and/or a higher level of participation, may improve adherence and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.