ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2023
Preceptoring of Graduate Nursing Students in Iraq.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connectivity between ethical sensitivity and empathy ability of nursing students at the initial stage of internship: a bridge network analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Using Peer-Assisted Learning to Enhance Clinical Reasoning Skills in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Study in Iraq.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- The role of self-perception in mental health: current insights on self-esteem and self-schemas.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Health Communication Strategies in Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study of Internet, mHealth, and Social Media Versus Traditional Methods.JMIR nursing · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to explore and examine the approaches utilized by preceptors in guiding graduate nursing students toward developing critical thinking skills within governmental nursing colleges in Iraq. Methods: The study involved 215 preceptors employed in Al governmental nursing colleges in Iraq. Purposive sampling was used to select participants who had at least two years of nursing preceptorship experience. A survey instrument consisting of two open-ended questions was used to collect data, and descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: Most preceptors (82.8%) agreed that critical thinking is important to graduate nursing education, and 93.5% agreed that critical thinking skills are adequately taught during preceptorship. Case studies (92.1%), simulation (87.4%), and problem-based learning (81.9%) were the most commonly used methods to enhance critical thinking skills in nursing students during preceptorship. The study identified six main challenges, including managing the diverse needs and abilities of students, integrating students into the clinical environment, educators' lack of knowledge, selection criteria, teaching strategies, and language. Conclusion: The study concluded that most preceptors acknowledged the significance of critical thinking in nursing education and felt that these skills were effectively taught during preceptorship. Preceptors employed different techniques like case studies, simulation, and problem-based learning to enhance critical thinking abilities in nursing students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.