ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023
Optimizing contrast protocol for bone-subtraction CT angiography of intracranial arteries in normal dogs using 160-slice CT.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of vascular characteristics in intracranial and extracranial tumors in veterinary patients.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Optimizing contrast protocol for bone-subtraction CT angiography of intracranial arteries in normal dogs using 160-slice CT.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone-subtraction computed tomography angiography (CTA) (BSCTA) is a new technique designed to overcome the limitation of three-dimensional CTA, where the vessels surrounded by bone and calcification can be obscured. An optimal contrast CT protocol for intracranial artery visualization with BSCTA has yet to be established in dogs.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the optimal contrast protocol of CTA for visualizing intracranial artery using an automatic bone-subtraction technique in dogs.
methodsBrain CTA was performed four times for each of nine healthy beagle dogs to cover all the contrast protocols: two different contrast iodine concentrations (300 and 370 mgI/mL) and two different contrast media injection rates (2 and 4 mL/s). Bone removal post-processing was performed automatically by subtracting the non-enhanced CT data from the contrast CT data using a dedicated workstation. The bone-subtracted intracranial vessels were analysed for quantitative and qualitative evaluation.
resultsQuantitative evaluation showed significantly higher CT attenuation values for the group with a 370 mgI/mL iodine content at a rate of 4 mL/s than the two groups with a 300 mgI/mL iodine content at the rates of 2 and 4 mL/s (p < 0.001). Qualitative assessment revealed significantly higher mean scores for the 370 mgI/mL groups than the 300 mgI/mL groups and significantly higher mean scores for the 4 mL/s groups than the 2 mL/s groups (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe optimal contrast protocol for BSCTA suggests that high iodine material concentration and high injection rate should be used for strong arterial attenuation and great visualization of the intracranial arterial structure in dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.