ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Superiority of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Over Nasogastric Feeding for Stroke-Induced Severe Dysphagia: A Comparative Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of enteral nutrition in stroke: an updated review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with dysphagia due to stroke may require enteral feeding using either a nasogastric (NG) feeding tube or a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. This study aimed to compare outcomes from NG tube and PEG tube feeding in 40 patients with severe dysphagia due to stroke. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 40 patients admitted to the hospital from April 2019 to December 2022 due to severe stroke dysphagia, who were divided into the gastrostomy group (20 patients) and the nasogastric feeding group (20 patients) in accordance with the random number table method. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was performed in both groups and we assessed differences in swallowing function, nutritional recovery, safety, and hope levels. RESULTS Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA) scores in both groups clearly decreased after the intervention, but there was greater reduction in the gastrostomy group (P<0.001). Both groups had distinct improvements of the levels of a variety of nutritional indicators after the intervention, but there was greater improvement in the gastrostomy group (P<0.001). The gastrostomy group also had fewer overall complications (P<0.001). Herth Hope Scale scores in both groups were significantly increased after intervention, and the gastrostomy group had a larger increase that the nasogastric feeding group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with nasogastric tube feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy has advantages in SSA score, protein level, and Herth Hope Scale in the treatment of stroke patients with dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.