Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37766309›Full record

ReviewViruses2023

Progress on Phage Display Technology: Tailoring Antibodies for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Renato Kaylan Alves França, Igor Cabral Studart, Marcus Rafael Lobo Bezerra, Larissa Queiroz Pontes, Antonio Marcos Aires Barbosa, Marcelo Macedo Brigido, Gilvan Pessoa Furtado, Andréa Queiroz Maranhão

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ImmTAC: A Novel Platform of T-Cell Receptor-Based Soluble Bispecifics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Renato Kaylan Alves FrançaMolecular Immunology Laboratory, Department of Cellular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-0971
Igor Cabral StudartOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Fiocruz Ceará, Eusébio 61773-270, Brazil.
Marcus Rafael Lobo BezerraOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Fiocruz Ceará, Eusébio 61773-270, Brazil.
Larissa Queiroz PontesOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Fiocruz Ceará, Eusébio 61773-270, Brazil.
Antonio Marcos Aires BarbosaOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Fiocruz Ceará, Eusébio 61773-270, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9190-1730
Marcelo Macedo BrigidoMolecular Immunology Laboratory, Department of Cellular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-7059
Gilvan Pessoa FurtadoOswaldo Cruz Foundation, Fiocruz Ceará, Eusébio 61773-270, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8797-7783
Andréa Queiroz MaranhãoMolecular Immunology Laboratory, Department of Cellular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1946-7191
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade de Fortaleza · BR

Funding

Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Distrito Frederal 00193-00000229/2021-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for innovative anti-cancer drugs remains a challenge. Over the past three decades, antibodies have emerged as an essential asset in successful cancer therapy. The major obstacle in developing anti-cancer antibodies is the need for non-immunogenic antibodies against human antigens. This unique requirement highlights a disadvantage to using traditional hybridoma technology and thus demands alternative approaches, such as humanizing murine monoclonal antibodies. To overcome these hurdles, human monoclonal antibodies can be obtained directly from Phage Display libraries, a groundbreaking tool for antibody selection. These libraries consist of genetically engineered viruses, or phages, which can exhibit antibody fragments, such as scFv or Fab on their capsid. This innovation allows the in vitro selection of novel molecules directed towards cancer antigens. As foreseen when Phage Display was first described, nowadays, several Phage Display-derived antibodies have entered clinical settings or are undergoing clinical evaluation. This comprehensive review unveils the remarkable progress in this field and the possibilities of using clever strategies for phage selection and tailoring the refinement of antibodies aimed at increasingly specific targets. Moreover, the use of selected antibodies in cutting-edge formats is discussed, such as CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) in CAR T-cell therapy or ADC (antibody drug conjugate), amplifying the spectrum of potential therapeutic avenues.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCell Surface Display TechniquesImmunotherapyNeoplasmsPeptide LibraryAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansSingle-Chain AntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmPeptide LibrarySingle-Chain Antibodiesbiopanningcancer therapyPhage Displaytherapeutic antibody

Identifiers

PMID37766309
PMCPMC10536222
OpenAlexW4386619426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.