Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37766194›Full record

ReviewViruses2023

COVID-19 Vaccines over Three Years after the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Epidemic.

Aleksandra Anna Zasada, Aniela Darlińska, Aldona Wiatrzyk, Katarzyna Woźnica, Kamila Formińska, Urszula Czajka, Małgorzata Główka, Klaudia Lis, Paulina Górska

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Platform technologies in vaccine development].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. High throughput screening for SARS-CoV-2 helicase inhibitors.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksandra Anna ZasadaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-0941
Aniela DarlińskaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-7709-1926
Aldona WiatrzykDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna WoźnicaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Kamila FormińskaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Urszula CzajkaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata GłówkaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Klaudia LisDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Paulina GórskaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 started in December 2019 and spread rapidly all over the world. It became clear that the development of an effective vaccine was the only way to stop the pandemic. It was the first time in the history of infectious diseases that the process of the development of a new vaccine was conducted on such a large scale and accelerated so rapidly. At the end of 2020, the first COVID-19 vaccines were approved for marketing. At the end of March 2023, over three years after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, 199 vaccines were in pre-clinical development and 183 in clinical development. The candidate vaccines in the clinical phase are based on the following platforms: protein subunit, DNA, RNA, non-replication viral vector, replicating viral vector, inactivated virus, virus-like particles, live attenuated virus, replicating viral vector combined with an antigen-presenting cell, non-replication viral vector combined with an antigen-presenting cell, and bacterial antigen-spore expression vector. Some of the new vaccine platforms have been approved for the first time for human application. This review presents COVID-19 vaccines currently available in the world, procedures for assurance of the quality and safety of the vaccines, the vaccinated population, as well as future perspectives for the new vaccine platforms in drug and therapy development for infectious and non-infectious diseases.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19DNA vaccinemRNA vaccinevaccinevaccine qualityvaccine safetyvector-based vaccineVLP vaccine

Identifiers

PMID37766194
PMCPMC10536649
OpenAlexW4386091920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.