Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765997›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Detecting Cyber Attacks In-Vehicle Diagnostics Using an Intelligent Multistage Framework.

Tasneem A Awaad, Mohamed Watheq El-Kharashi, Mohamed Taher, Ayman Tawfik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tasneem A AwaadDepartment of Computer and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-8600
Mohamed Watheq El-KharashiDepartment of Computer and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-733X
Mohamed TaherDepartment of Computer and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-4018
Ayman TawfikElectrical Engineering Department, Ajman University, P.O. Box 346, Ajman 2758, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-1438-6541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advanced technology of vehicles makes them vulnerable to external exploitation. The current trend of research is to impose security measures to protect vehicles from different aspects. One of the main problems that counter Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) is the necessity to have a low false acceptance rate (FA) with high detection accuracy without major changes in the vehicle network infrastructure. Furthermore, the location of IDSs can be controversial due to the limitations and concerns of Electronic Control Units (ECUs). Thus, we propose a novel framework of multistage to detect abnormality in vehicle diagnostic data based on specifications of diagnostics and stacking ensemble for various machine learning models. The proposed framework is verified against the KIA SOUL and Seat Leon 2018 datasets. Our IDS is evaluated against point anomaly attacks and period anomaly attacks that have not been used in its training. The results show the superiority of the framework and its robustness with high accuracy of 99.21%, a low false acceptance rate of 0.003%, and a good detection rate (DR) of 99.63% for Seat Leon 2018, and an accuracy of 99.22%, a low false acceptance rate of 0.005%, and good detection rate of 98.59% for KIA SOUL.

Indexed as

anomaly detectioncyber-physical securityintrusion detectionmachine learningvehicle diagnosticsvehicular security

Identifiers

PMID37765997
PMCPMC10535859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.