ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Reconstruction of a Car-Running Pedestrian Accident Based on a Humanoid Robot Method.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the characteristics of multibody (MB) and finite element (FE) digital human body models (HBMs), the reconstruction of running pedestrians (RPs) remains a major challenge in traffic accidents (TAs) and new innovative methods are needed. This study presents a novel approach for reconstructing moving pedestrian TAs based on a humanoid robot method to improve the accuracy of analyzing dynamic vehicle-pedestrian collision accidents. Firstly, we applied the theory of humanoid robots to the corresponding joints and centroids of the TNO HBM and implemented the pedestrian running process. Secondly, we used rigid-flexible coupling HBMs to build pedestrians, which can not only simulate running but also analyze human injuries. Then, we validated the feasibility of the RP reconstruction method by comparing the simulated dynamics with the pedestrian in the accident. Next, we extracted the velocity and posture of the pedestrian at the moment of collision and further validated the modeling method through a comparison of human injuries and forensic autopsy results. Finally, by comparing two other cases, we can conclude that there are relative errors in both the pedestrian injury results and the rest position. This comparative analysis is helpful for understanding the differences in injury characteristics between the running pedestrian and the other two cases in TAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.