Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765912›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

HIDM: Hybrid Intrusion Detection Model for Industry 4.0 Networks Using an Optimized CNN-LSTM with Transfer Learning.

Umesh Kumar Lilhore, Poongodi Manoharan, Sarita Simaiya, Roobaea Alroobaea, Majed Alsafyani, Abdullah M Baqasah, Surjeet Dalal, Ashish Sharma, Kaamran Raahemifar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Umesh Kumar LilhoreDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali 140413, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6073-3773
Poongodi ManoharanCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha P.O Box 5825, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-6138
Sarita SimaiyaApex Institute of Technology (CSE), Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali 140413, India.
Roobaea AlroobaeaDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1585-2962
Majed AlsafyaniDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah M BaqasahDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21974, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0511-0159
Surjeet DalalAmity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Gurugram 122412, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4325-9237
Ashish SharmaDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India.
Kaamran RaahemifarData Science and Artificial Intelligence Program, College of Information Sciences and Technology, Penn State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9835-7897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrial automation systems are undergoing a revolutionary change with the use of Internet-connected operating equipment and the adoption of cutting-edge advanced technology such as AI, IoT, cloud computing, and deep learning within business organizations. These innovative and additional solutions are facilitating Industry 4.0. However, the emergence of these technological advances and the quality solutions that they enable will also introduce unique security challenges whose consequence needs to be identified. This research presents a hybrid intrusion detection model (HIDM) that uses OCNN-LSTM and transfer learning (TL) for Industry 4.0. The proposed model utilizes an optimized CNN by using enhanced parameters of the CNN via the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) method, which fine-tunes the CNN parameters and helps to improve the model's prediction accuracy. The transfer learning model helps to train the model, and it transfers the knowledge to the OCNN-LSTM model. The TL method enhances the training process, acquiring the necessary knowledge from the OCNN-LSTM model and utilizing it in each next cycle, which helps to improve detection accuracy. To measure the performance of the proposed model, we conducted a multi-class classification analysis on various online industrial IDS datasets, i.e., ToN-IoT and UNW-NB15. We have conducted two experiments for these two datasets, and various performance-measuring parameters, i.e., precision, F-measure, recall, accuracy, and detection rate, were calculated for the OCNN-LSTM model with and without TL and also for the CNN and LSTM models. For the ToN-IoT dataset, the OCNN-LSTM with TL model achieved a precision of 92.7%; for the UNW-NB15 dataset, the precision was 94.25%, which is higher than OCNN-LSTM without TL.

Indexed as

cyber securitydeep learningGWOIndustry 4.0LSTMoptimized CNNtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37765912
PMCPMC10535139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.