Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765835›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Evaluation of a Scintillating Plastic Optical Fiber Device for Measuring kV-Cone Beam Computed Tomography Dose.

Christian Popotte, Romain Letellier, Didier Paul, Alexandre Waltener, Nicolas Guillochon, Mélodie Munier, Paul Retif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian PopotteINSERM Unité U1296 Radiations: Défense, Santé Environnement, 69008 Lyon, France.ORCID 0009-0001-3158-7567
Romain LetellierMedical Physics Unit, CHR Metz-Thionville, 57000 Metz, France.
Didier PaulINSERM Unité U1296 Radiations: Défense, Santé Environnement, 69008 Lyon, France.
Alexandre WaltenerMedical Physics Unit, CHR Metz-Thionville, 57000 Metz, France.
Nicolas GuillochonFibermetrix, 7 Allée de l'Europe, 67960 Entzheim, France.
Mélodie MunierINSERM Unité U1296 Radiations: Défense, Santé Environnement, 69008 Lyon, France.
Paul RetifMedical Physics Unit, CHR Metz-Thionville, 57000 Metz, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4997-2620
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional de Metz-Thionville · FRCentre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJustification of imaging procedures such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in radiotherapy makes no doubt. However, the CBCT composite dose is rarely reported or optimized, even though the repeated CBCT cumulative dose can be up to 3% of the prescription dose. This study aimed to evaluate the performance and utility of a new plastic scintillating optical fiber dosimeter for CBCT dosimetric quality assurance (QA) applications before a potential application in patient composite CBCT dosimetry.

methodsThe dosimeter, made of 1 mm diameter plastic fiber, was installed under a linear accelerator treatment table and linked to photodetectors. The fiber impact on the fluence and dose delivered was respectively assessed with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and EBT3 Gafchromic

resultsThe maximum impact of the fiber on the fluence measured by the EPID was -1.2% for the 6 MV flattening filter-free beam. However, the fiber did not alter the film dose profile when measured for all the beams tested. The fiber was not visible at energies ≥ 80 kV and was merely visible on the CBCT images. When the rate of images per second or mA was changed, the maximum relative difference between the device and the ionization chamber CTDIs was <5%. Changing collimation led to a -7.2% maximum relative difference with an absolute dose difference that was insignificant (-0.3 mGy). Changing kV was associated with a -8.7% maximum relative difference, as published in the literature.

conclusionsThe dosimeter may be a promising device for CBCT recurrent dosimetry quality control or dose optimization. According to these results, further developments are in progress in order to adapt the solution to the measurement of patient composite CBCT doses.

Indexed as

ArtifactsOptical FibersCone-Beam Computed TomographyEmotionsHumansInterior Design and FurnishingsCBCTIGRToptical fiberscintillating dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID37765835
PMCPMC10536616
OpenAlexW4386608394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.