Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765786›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Lifespan of Human Activity Recognition Systems for Smart Homes.

Shruthi K Hiremath, Thomas Plötz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shruthi K HiremathSchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-8864
Thomas PlötzSchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1243-7563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing interest in smart home environments and in providing seamless interactions with various smart devices, robust and reliable human activity recognition (HAR) systems are becoming essential. Such systems provide automated assistance to residents or to longitudinally monitor their daily activities for health and well-being assessments, as well as for tracking (long-term) behavior changes. These systems thus contribute towards an understanding of the health and continued well-being of residents. Smart homes are personalized settings where residents engage in everyday activities in their very own idiosyncratic ways. In order to provide a fully functional HAR system that requires minimal supervision, we provide a systematic analysis and a technical definition of the lifespan of activity recognition systems for smart homes. Such a designed lifespan provides for the different phases of building the HAR system, where these different phases are motivated by an application scenario that is typically observed in the home setting. Through the aforementioned phases, we detail the technical solutions that are required to be developed for each phase such that it becomes possible to derive and continuously improve the HAR system through data-driven procedures. The detailed lifespan can be used as a framework for the design of state-of-the-art procedures corresponding to the different phases.

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesLongevityHumansRecognition, PsychologySystems Analysisdata-driven procedureshuman activity recognitionlifespanminimal supervisionsmart homes

Identifiers

PMID37765786
PMCPMC10536432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.