Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765477›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Complementary Analysis and Implementation Plan for Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives in Finland.

Heli Fitzgerald, Elina Kiviharju, Anna Palmé, Marko Hyvärinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heli FitzgeraldBotany Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 7, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Elina KiviharjuNatural Resources Institute Finland, Luke, 31600 Jokioinen, Finland.
Anna PalméNordic Genetic Resource Center, NordGen, 234 56 Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8012-8359
Marko HyvärinenBotany Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 7, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8736-0946

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 3635/020107/2017 and 2083/00.03.01/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop wild relatives (CWR) are valuable wild plant species that can be used as genetic resources providing adaptive traits to crop plants and therefore they play an important role in future food security. This paper describes in situ and ex situ conservation planning of CWR species in Finland and includes the following parts: (a) drafting of the national CWR priority list, (b) undertaking the in situ conservation gap analysis and (c) identifying ex situ conservation gaps and multi-species collecting sites for the CWR in Finland. As a result of the study, essential information was acquired, which will enhance future planning of active science-based practical conservation of CWR in Finland. Based on the new data and earlier work, a number of conservation recommendations are presented. This national work has been carried out in connection with the larger Nordic regional CWR co-operation.

Indexed as

crop wild relativesex situ conservationin situ conservationplant genetic resources

Identifiers

PMID37765477
PMCPMC10537885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.