Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765288›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

A Guide to Best Practice in Sensory Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations.

David Clapham, Emilie Belissa, Sabine Inghelbrecht, Anne-Marie Pensé-Lhéritier, Fabrice Ruiz, Liz Sheehan, Margaret Shine, Thibault Vallet, Jennifer Walsh, Catherine Tuleu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David ClaphamIndependent Researcher, Bishop's Stortford CM23 4FQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3075-7621
Emilie BelissaUCB Pharma, 1420 Braine l'Alleud, Belgium.
Sabine InghelbrechtJanssen Research & Development, Johnson& Johnson, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Anne-Marie Pensé-LhéritierFRM GaleSens, 95000 Cergy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-0180
Fabrice RuizClinSearch, 92240 Malakoff, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9167-0189
Liz SheehanSRL Pharma, T12 XF62 Cork, Ireland.
Margaret ShineSRL Pharma, T12 XF62 Cork, Ireland.
Thibault ValletClinSearch, 92240 Malakoff, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3643-5500
Jennifer WalshJenny Walsh Consulting Ltd., Nottingham NG2 1EP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0804-3430
Catherine TuleuUCL School of Pharmacy, London WC1N 1AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-357X
Herts and Essex Hospital · GBJanssen (Belgium) · BEThe London College · GBUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that treatment regime compliance is linked to the acceptability of a pharmaceutical formulation, and hence also to therapeutic outcomes. To that end, acceptability must be assessed during the development of all pharmaceutical products and especially for those intended for paediatric patients. Although acceptability is a multifaceted concept, poor sensory characteristics often contribute to poor patient acceptability. In particular, poor taste is often cited as a major reason for many patients, especially children, to refuse to take their medicine. It is thus important to understand and, as far as possible, optimise the sensory characteristics and, in particular, the taste/flavour/mouthfeel of the formulation throughout the development of the product. Sensory analysis has been widely practiced, providing objective data concerning the sensory aspects of food and cosmetic products. In this paper, we present proposals concerning how the well-established principles of sensory analysis can best be applied to pharmaceutical product development, allowing objective, scientifically valid, sensory data to be obtained safely. We briefly discuss methodologies that may be helpful in reducing the number of samples that may need to be assessed by human volunteers. However, it is only possible to be sure whether or not the sensory characteristics of a pharmaceutical product are non-aversive to potential users by undertaking sensory assessments in human volunteers. Testing is also required during formulation assessment and to ensure that the sensory characteristics remain acceptable throughout the product shelf life. We provide a risk assessment procedure to aid developers to define where studies are low risk, the results of a survey of European regulators on their views concerning such studies, and detailed guidance concerning the types of sensory studies that can be undertaken at each phase of product development, along with guidance about the practicalities of performing such sensory studies. We hope that this guidance will also lead to the development of internationally agreed standards between industry and regulators concerning how these aspects should be measured and assessed throughout the development process and when writing and evaluating regulatory submissions. Finally, we hope that the guidance herein will help formulators as they seek to develop better medicines for all patients and, in particular, paediatric patients.

Indexed as

acceptabilitycompliancehuman sensory analysismouthfeelnon-human sensory analysispalatabilityrisk assessmentsensory analysissensory datataste

Identifiers

PMID37765288
PMCPMC10535428
OpenAlexW4386782934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.