ArticlePharmaceutics2023
Virus-like Silica Nanoparticles Improve Permeability of Macromolecules across the Blood-Brain Barrier In Vitro.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking Biological Barriers: Engineering Nanocarriers for Efficient Drug and Gene Delivery through Nano-Bio Interfaces and Biophysical Design.Applied physics reviews · 2026Article
- Piperazine-Functionalized Nanoparticles Enable Oral Insulin Delivery in Obese Mice.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Small Particles, Big Impact: Inorganic Nanotechnology for Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Current Non-Metal Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutic Approaches for Glioblastoma Treatment.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits the delivery of therapies into the brain. There has been significant interest in overcoming the BBB for the effective delivery of therapies to the brain. Inorganic nanomaterials, especially silica nanoparticles with varying surface chemistry and surface topology, have been recently used as permeation enhancers for oral protein delivery. In this context, nanoparticles with varying sizes and surface chemistries have been employed to overcome this barrier; however, there is no report examining the effect of nanoscale roughness on BBB permeability. This paper reports the influence of nanoscale surface roughness on the integrity and permeability of the BBB in vitro, using smooth surface Stöber silica nanoparticles (60 nm) compared to rough surface virus-like silica nanoparticles (VSNP, 60 nm). Our findings reveal that VSNP (1 mg/mL) with virus-mimicking-topology spiky surface have a greater effect on transiently opening endothelial tight junctions of the BBB than the same dose of Stöber silica nanoparticles (1 mg/mL) by increasing the FITC-Dextran (70 kDa) permeability 1.9-fold and by decreasing the trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) by 2.7-fold. This proof-of-concept research paves the way for future studies to develop next-generation tailored surface-modified silica nanoparticles, enabling safe and efficient macromolecule transport across the BBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.