ArticlePharmaceutics2023
Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Nitrofurantoin in Rabbits, Rats, and Humans.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic uropathogenic Escherichia coli infections in adolescence: in vitro analysis of clinical isolates, multidrug resistance, and in vivo hippocampal cognitive impacts.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- SWOT and Root Cause Analyses of Antimicrobial Resistance to Oral Antimicrobial Treatment of Cystitis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nitrofurantoin (NFT) is a commonly used antibiotic for the treatment of urinary tract infections that can cause liver toxicity. Despite reports of hepatic adverse events associated with NFT exposure, there is still limited understanding of the interplay between NFT exposure, its disposition, and the risk of developing liver toxicity. In this study, we aim to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for NFT in three different species (rabbits, rats, and humans) that can be used as a standard tool for predicting drug-induced liver injury (DILI). We created several versions of the PBPK model using previously published kinetics data from rabbits, and integrated enterohepatic recirculation (EHR) using rat data. Our model showed that active tubular secretion and reabsorption in the kidney are critical in explaining the non-linear renal clearance and urine kinetics of NFT. We subsequently extrapolated the PBPK model to humans. Adapting the physiology to humans led to predictions consistent with human kinetics data, considering a low amount of NFT to be excreted into bile. Model simulations predicted that the liver of individuals with a moderate-to-severe glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is exposed to two-to-three-fold higher concentrations of NFT than individuals with a normal GFR, which coincided with a substantial reduction in the NFT urinary concentration. In conclusion, people with renal insufficiency may be at a higher risk of developing DILI due to NFT exposure, while at the same time having a suboptimal therapeutic effect with a high risk of drug resistance. Our PBPK model can in the future be used to predict NFT kinetics in individual patients on the basis of characteristics like age and GFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.