Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37764803›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Conducting 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in Group Settings with Adults Having Low-Income: Perspectives of EFNEP Peer Educators.

Karen Franck, Michael Puglisi, Annie J Roe, Susan Baker, Teresa Henson, Dawn Earnesty, Kavitha Sankavaram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Karen FranckDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4501, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5372-3075
Michael PuglisiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Annie J RoeMargaret Ritchie School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3183, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5779-8488
Susan BakerDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7671-5104
Teresa HensonFamily and Consumer Sciences Department, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA.
Dawn EarnestyHealth and Nutrition Institute, Michigan State University Extension, Saginaw, MI 48607, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0837-5678
Kavitha SankavaramDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Colorado State University · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Pine Bluff · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Idaho · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

The University of Tennessee N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) is a federally funded program that teaches nutrition education to adults and youth with low-income. EFNEP is funded throughout the United States including federal territories. The purpose of EFNEP is to provide nutrition education. Evaluation for adult programs includes pre/post surveys and pre/post 24-h diet recalls (24HDR). A validated standard of dietary measures, 24HDR are useful when collected as designed: one-on-one by a trained professional. In EFNEP, 24HDR are collected in group settings by EFNEP peer educators who often have not received a college degree or any formal education in nutrition. The purpose of this study was to explore attitudes and behaviors of EFNEP peer educators regarding how they collect diet recalls in a group setting, their perceptions of how adult participants feel about the recalls, and the benefits and challenges of using recalls. Online interviews were conducted with EFNEP peer educators across the U.S. Peer educators recognized the importance of collecting the recall data but identified several challenges such as time, resources, and participant reluctance to complete the recall. Program evaluation through methods like the 24HDR is important to measure outcomes and inform program improvements but also needs to include how evaluation can benefit participants and minimize data collection burden. Future research needs to examine the validity of collecting recalls in a group setting compared to other measures of diet quality.

Indexed as

DietHealth EducationAdolescentAdultFeeding BehaviorFoodHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesdietary measureslow-incomenutrition education

Identifiers

PMID37764803
PMCPMC10534895
OpenAlexW4386838475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.