ReviewNutrients2023
The Gluten-Free Diet for Celiac Disease: Critical Insights to Better Understand Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relative risk of oral manifestations with celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Micronutrient deficiencies in patients with celiac disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyPooled it
- Refractory Celiac Disease: Nutritional Failure, Immune Dysregulation, and Lymphomagenesis.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Laboratory Monitoring of Nutritional Deficiencies in Children Following Restrictive Diets: A Narrative Review and Risk-Based Considerations.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Is dieting a double-edged sword? Orthorexia in celiac disease.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Attitudes and Barriers Toward Consumption of More Plant-Based Foods Among Danish Patients with Celiac Disease.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Review
- Fermentation in breadmaking: enhancing digestibility and nutritional value for gastrointestinal health.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Healthcare resource utilization and cost in pediatric celiac disease: A case-control study using German insurance data.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- Impact of Mediterranean diet-based nutritional intervention on gluten-free diet, nutritional status, and quality of life in a pediatric celiac population: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Rethinking Celiac Disease Management: Treatment Approaches Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Celiac Disease as a Model of Intestinal Malnutrition: Mechanisms and Nutritional Management.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Gut Microbiota and Autism: Unlocking Connections.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Article
- Gluten-free diet adherence patterns and health outcomes in celiac disease: a retrospective observational study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Effect of a Gluten-Free Diet on the Intestinal Microbiota of Women with Celiac Disease.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward nutritional deficiencies in celiac disease among medical students and healthcare providers in Egypt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Laboratory and Clinical Practices in the Study of Coeliac Disease in Children and Adults: Recommendations from a Spanish Multicentre Survey.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gluten-free diet (GFD) remains a complex paradigm in managing celiac disease (CeD) in children and adults, and there are many reasons why GFD adherence should be strict to improve outcomes. However, this is a challenging task for patients, since they need to have access to quality healthcare resources that facilitate optimal GFD adherence. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the GFD, tackling coexisting nutritional deficiencies, and dealing with complex situations, such as seronegative CeD or non-responsive CeD, all require the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. The short- and long-term follow-up of CeD patients should preferably be performed by a combined Gastroenterology and Nutrition service with well-defined quality standards and the multidisciplinary involvement of physicians, nurses, dietitians, and psychologists. Nutritional advice and counseling by an experienced dietitian can reduce the costs associated with long-term follow-up of CeD patients. Likewise, psychological interventions may be essential in specific scenarios where implementing and sustaining a lifelong GFD can cause a significant psychological burden for patients. This manuscript aims to provide guidelines to improve clinical practice in the follow-up and monitoring of CeD patients and provide information on the nutritional risks of an ill-advised GFD. Clinicians, biochemists, food technologists, dietitians, and psychologists with a global view of the disease have been involved in its writing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.