Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37764701›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

The Association between Food Security Status and the Home Food Environment among a Sample of Rural South Carolina Residents.

Cassius Hossfeld, Lior Rennert, Samuel L K Baxter, Sarah F Griffin, Michelle Parisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cassius HossfeldDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0373-5251
Lior RennertDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5275-7273
Samuel L K BaxterDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9916-4694
Sarah F GriffinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Michelle ParisiCooperative Extension Service, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research suggests that food security status may have an effect on the home food environment. Further, the literature suggests that food access factors may function to influence said relationship. The purpose of this research is to fill a gap in the literature on this relationship, as well as to identify potential food access effect modifiers. This research employs linear mixed effects modeling with a random intercept variable (zip codes). Eleven food access variables are included in regression analyses and are tested as potential effect modifiers in the association between food security status and the home food environment. Food security status is significantly associated with the home food environment (95% CI = 0.1-1.38) in the unadjusted model. In the adjusted model, food pantry usage is found to be a significant effect modifier on the association between food security status and the home food environment. This research concludes that food security status has a significant but disparate effect on the home food environment depending on participant food pantry usage. Practical implications from this research would be for relevant stakeholders to potentially improve rural food pantry access in order to increase the home food environment among rural and food insecure populations.

Indexed as

FoodNonoxynolFood SecurityHumansLinear ModelsSouth CarolinaNonoxynolfood pantryfood securityhome food environmentrural

Identifiers

PMID37764701
PMCPMC10534860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.