Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37764648›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Comparison of the Declared Nutrient Content of Plant-Based Meat Substitutes and Corresponding Meat Products and Sausages in Germany.

Corinna Gréa, Anna Dittmann, David Wolff, Romy Werner, Christin Turban, Silvia Roser, Ingrid Hoffmann, Stefan Storcksdieck Genannt Bonsmann

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corinna GréaDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Anna DittmannDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
David WolffDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Romy WernerDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Christin TurbanDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-5394-7406
Silvia RoserPresidential Office, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ingrid HoffmannDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Stefan Storcksdieck Genannt BonsmannDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut (MRI)-Federal Research Institute of Food and Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5638-4099
Max Rubner Institut · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture Germany not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based meat substitutes (PBMS) are becoming increasingly popular due to growing concerns about health, animal welfare, and environmental issues associated with animal-based foods. The aim of this study was to compare the declared energy and nutrient contents of PBMS with corresponding meat products and sausages available on the German market. Mandatory nutrition labelling data of 424 PBMS and 1026 meat products and sausages, surveyed in 2021 and 2020, respectively, as part of the German national monitoring of packaged food were used to test for differences in energy and nutrient contents. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to describe characteristics in the energy and nutrient contents. The comparison showed that most of the PBMS subcategories had significantly lower contents of fat and saturated fat but higher contents of carbohydrate and sugar than corresponding meat subcategories. For salt, the only striking difference was that PBMS salamis had lower salt content than meat salamis. Overall, the PCA revealed protein as a main characteristic for most PBMS categories, with the protein content being equivalent to or, in most protein-based PBMS, even higher than in the corresponding meat products. The wide nutrient content ranges within subcategories, especially for salt, reveal the need and potential for reformulation.

Indexed as

Food LabelingMeat ProductsNutrientsNutritive ValueAnimalsDietary FatsDietary ProteinsGermanyHumansMeat SubstitutesPrincipal Component AnalysisDietary FatsDietary Proteinsalternative proteinmeat productsplant-based meat substitutereformulationsausagesvegetarian

Identifiers

PMID37764648
PMCPMC10535434
OpenAlexW4386439903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.