Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37764645›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Sustainability Perception of Italian Consumers: Is it Possible to Replace Meat, and What Is the Best Alternative?

Vittoria Aureli, Alessandra Nardi, Nadia Palmieri, Daniele Peluso, Jacopo Niccolò Di Veroli, Umberto Scognamiglio, Laura Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vittoria AureliCREA Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, 00178 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra NardiDepartment of Mathematics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Nadia PalmieriCREA Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7178-3733
Daniele PelusoDepartment of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Jacopo Niccolò Di VeroliCREA Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, 00178 Rome, Italy.
Umberto ScognamiglioCREA Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, 00178 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1109-2302
Laura RossiCREA Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, 00178 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9976-9394

Funding

the project FAOWASTE: "Food waste in Italy: International policies and measurements" Nos. 23278-27 and 12.2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing worldwide food demand with its environmental impacts requires a reshaping of food consumption. This study aims to evaluate the degree of Italian consumers' awareness of sustainability and whether protein alternatives to meat could be accepted. A cross-sectional survey was carried out on a group of 815 respondents, representative of the Italian adult population for geography, gender, and age, using multivariate analysis together with cluster analysis. Lack of awareness of the consequences of food choices on the environment was found in 45% of respondents, and 51% reduced their consumption of meat. Typical foods of the Mediterranean diet (84% legumes 82% eggs, and 77% fish) were selected as the preferred sources of protein to replace meat, while insects and insect-based products were less accepted (67%). The importance of meat is the latent factor that explains more than 50% of the common variance observed in the factor analysis. The cluster analysis confirmed the importance of meat for Italian consumers, emphasizing other aspects of the sustainability of food choices. Cluster 1 (25.6%) considered meat very important. Two out of five clusters (clusters 2 and 3, 38%) considered meat replaceable in the diet, and cluster 4 (31.3%) included meat consumers that were willing to be sustainable. Cluster 5 identifies the "unsustainable consumers" (5.7%). In conclusion, besides the perceived importance of meat, there is room for recommendations for its reduction by proposing alternative foods already present in the Mediterranean diet.

Indexed as

EggsMeatAnimalsCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesPerceptionconsumers’ behaviordietary recommendationsItalymeatmeat alternativesustainability

Identifiers

PMID37764645
PMCPMC10650016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.