Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37764510›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Bacterial and Fungal Biocontrol Agents for Plant Disease Protection: Journey from Lab to Field, Current Status, Challenges, and Global Perspectives.

Muhammad Ayaz, Cai-Hong Li, Qurban Ali, Wei Zhao, Yuan-Kai Chi, Muhammad Shafiq, Farman Ali, Xi-Yue Yu, Qing Yu, Jing-Tian Zhao and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
95.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Characterization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Biofertilizer and Antifungal Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Antifungal Activity of NativeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Advances in the Control of Plant Fungal Pathogens.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad AyazInstitute of Plant Protection and Agro-Products Safety, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230041, China.
Cai-Hong LiCotton Sciences Research Institute of Hunan, Changde 415101, China.
Qurban AliKey Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1459-4009
Wei ZhaoInstitute of Plant Protection and Agro-Products Safety, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230041, China.
Yuan-Kai ChiInstitute of Plant Protection and Agro-Products Safety, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230041, China.
Muhammad ShafiqBiology Department and Institute of Marine Sciences, College of Science, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Farman AliDepartment of Entomology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan 23200, Pakistan.
Xi-Yue YuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Qing YuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Jing-Tian ZhaoState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Jing-Wen YuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-5335
Ren-De QiInstitute of Plant Protection and Agro-Products Safety, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2693-6507
Wen-Kun HuangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1106-9308
Institute of Plant Protection · CNAbdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKCotton Research Institute · CNNanjing Agricultural University · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2600404), The Natural Science Foundation of China (32172382), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2021JJ40285), Changde Science and Technolo 2021YFC2600404, 32172382, 2021JJ40285, CKH (2022-51)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are constantly exposed to various phytopathogens such as fungi, Oomycetes, nematodes, bacteria, and viruses. These pathogens can significantly reduce the productivity of important crops worldwide, with annual crop yield losses ranging from 20% to 40% caused by various pathogenic diseases. While the use of chemical pesticides has been effective at controlling multiple diseases in major crops, excessive use of synthetic chemicals has detrimental effects on the environment and human health, which discourages pesticide application in the agriculture sector. As a result, researchers worldwide have shifted their focus towards alternative eco-friendly strategies to prevent plant diseases. Biocontrol of phytopathogens is a less toxic and safer method that reduces the severity of various crop diseases. A variety of biological control agents (BCAs) are available for use, but further research is needed to identify potential microbes and their natural products with a broad-spectrum antagonistic activity to control crop diseases. This review aims to highlight the importance of biocontrol strategies for managing crop diseases. Furthermore, the role of beneficial microbes in controlling plant diseases and the current status of their biocontrol mechanisms will be summarized. The review will also cover the challenges and the need for the future development of biocontrol methods to ensure efficient crop disease management for sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

NematodaPesticidesAgricultureAnimalsBacteriaCrops, AgriculturalHumansPlant DiseasesPesticidesbiocontrolnatural productsplant diseasesrhizosphere microbessustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID37764510
PMCPMC10537577
OpenAlexW4386913398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.