Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37764152›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Comparison of the Effects of Feeding Compound Probiotics and Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota, and Small Intestine Morphology in Yellow-Feather Broilers.

Yuyan Feng, Xiaoting Wu, Dan Hu, Canyang Wang, Qu Chen, Yingdong Ni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moderate DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Relationship BetweenVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of supplementing aBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuyan FengKey Laboratory of Animal Physiology & Biochemistry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Xiaoting WuKey Laboratory of Animal Physiology & Biochemistry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Dan HuKey Laboratory of Animal Physiology & Biochemistry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Canyang WangKey Laboratory of Animal Physiology & Biochemistry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Qu ChenState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Agro-Product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Yingdong NiKey Laboratory of Animal Physiology & Biochemistry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFE0114400Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions PAPD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was devoted to the comparison of the probiotic effect of compound probiotics to antibiotics as a feed additive for chicken. Two hundred and seventy newly hatched yellow-feather broilers were randomly divided into three groups: the control group (Con), probiotics (Pb), and antibiotics group (Ab). The Pb group received compound probiotics (

Indexed as

antibioticsgut microbiotaprobioticsyellow-feather broilers

Identifiers

PMID37764152
PMCPMC10535644
OpenAlexW4386744369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.