Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37764075›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2023

Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades?

Shiwani Kamath, Hiba Hammad Altaq, Tony Abdo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The weekend effect in sepsis and septic shock: a 5-year US national study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shiwani KamathSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, The Oklahoma City VA Health Care System, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Hiba Hammad AltaqSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, The Oklahoma City VA Health Care System, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-7517
Tony AbdoSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, The Oklahoma City VA Health Care System, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8238-7573
Oklahoma City VA Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome encompassing physiologic and biological abnormalities caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sepsis progression into septic shock is associated with a dramatic increase in mortality, hence the importance of early identification and treatment. Over the last two decades, the definition of sepsis has evolved to improve early sepsis recognition and screening, standardize the terms used to describe sepsis and highlight its association with organ dysfunction and higher mortality. The early 2000s witnessed the birth of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT), which showed a dramatic reduction in mortality leading to its wide adoption, and the surviving sepsis campaign (SSC), which has been instrumental in developing and updating sepsis guidelines over the last 20 years. Outside of early fluid resuscitation and antibiotic therapy, sepsis management has transitioned to a less aggressive approach over the last few years, shying away from routine mixed venous oxygen saturation and central venous pressure monitoring and excessive fluids resuscitation, inotropes use, and red blood cell transfusions. Peripheral vasopressor use was deemed safe and is rising, and resuscitation with balanced crystalloids and a restrictive fluid strategy was explored. This review will address some of sepsis management's most important yet controversial components and summarize the available evidence from the last two decades.

Indexed as

colloidscorticosteroidscrystalloidsearly goal-directed therapysepsisseptic shocksurviving sepsis campaignvasopressors

Identifiers

PMID37764075
PMCPMC10537306
OpenAlexW4386423041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.