Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Raquel Martin-AlonsoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-3789
Valeria RolleStatistics and Data Management Unit, iMaterna Foundation, Alcalá de Henares, 28806 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1793-7049
Ranjit AkolekarMedway Fetal and Maternal Medicine Centre, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham M75NY, UK.
Catalina de Paco MatallanaHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Irene Fernández-BuhigasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4354-5273
Maria Isabel Sánchez-CampsHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Tara GiacchinoFacultad de Estudios Estadísticos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-6815
Miguel Rodríguez-FernándezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain.
Jose Eliseo Blanco-CarneroHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Belén SantacruzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain.
María M GilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESHospital Universitario de Torrejón · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESCanterbury Christ Church University · GBInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ES
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Efficiency of the Cerebroplacental Ratio in Identifying High-Risk Late-Term Pregnancies. · full record | OpenQuestion