Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37763753›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2023

Current Trends for Delirium Screening within the Emergency Department.

Angela Saviano, Christian Zanza, Yaroslava Longhitano, Veronica Ojetti, Francesco Franceschi, Abdelouahab Bellou, Antonio Voza, Iride Francesca Ceresa, Gabriele Savioli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Angela SavianoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Christian ZanzaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Yaroslava LonghitanoItalian Society of Prehospital Emergency Medicine (SIS 118), 74121 Taranto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-1361
Veronica OjettiSchool of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8953-0707
Francesco FranceschiInstitute of Sciences in Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Abdelouahab BellouInstitute of Sciences in Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3457-5585
Antonio VozaEmergency Department, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20089 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7309-6929
Iride Francesca CeresaEmergency Room and Internal Medicine, Istituti Clinici di Pavia e Vigevano, Gruppo San Donato, 27029 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5460-4625
Gabriele SavioliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8679-5435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delirium is an acute neurological disorder that involves attention and cognition. It is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality among older people (>65 years old). In the context of the Emergency Department (ED), it is frequently experienced by patients but often not recognized. Literature studies have identified some screening instruments for an initial evaluation of delirium. Most of these tools have not been validated yet in the context of emergencies, but, in other settings, they were very useful for assessing and maximizing the recognition of this condition among older patients. We conducted a review of the literature, including randomized control trials, clinical and observational studies, and research studies published in recent years, confirming that most of the screening tools for delirium used in the intensive care unit (ICU) or the geriatric department have not been tested in the ED, and the ideal timing and form of the delirium assessment process for older adults have not been defined yet. The aim of our review is to summarize the updated evidence about the screening tools for delirium in the context of the ED, due to the fact that overcrowding of the ED and the stressful condition of emergency situations (that contribute to the onset of delirium) could expose older patients to a high risk of complications and mortality if delirium is not promptly recognized. In conclusion, we support the evidence that delirium is a current and real condition that emergency physicians have to face daily, and we are aware that more research is needed to explore this field in order to improve the overall outcomes of older patients admitted to the ED.

Indexed as

DeliriumEmergency Service, HospitalAgedAwarenessCognitionHospitalizationHumansdeliriumelderlyemergency departmentemergency medicinepainscreeningsedationsepsis

Identifiers

PMID37763753
PMCPMC10537118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.