Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37763710›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2023

Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement with Concurrent Disorders of Spinopelvic Anatomy: A Narrative Review.

Richard Ambrus, Pavel Douša, Jozef Almási, Boris Šteňo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard AmbrusDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nemocnica Bory Penta Hospitals International, I. Kadlecika 2, Lamac, 841 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0009-0004-5201-038X
Pavel DoušaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University, FNKV Srobarova 50, 100 34 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jozef AlmásiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nemocnica Bory Penta Hospitals International, I. Kadlecika 2, Lamac, 841 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Boris ŠteňoII. University Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bratislava and Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Antolska 11, Petrzalka, 851 01 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-3220-7455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high success rate of primary total hip replacement (THR), a significant early revision rate remains, which is largely attributed to instability and dislocations. Despite the implants being placed according to the safe zone philosophy of Lewinnek, occurrence of THR dislocation is not an uncommon complication. Large diagnostic and computational model studies have shown variability in patients' mobility based on the individual anatomic and functional relationship of the hip-pelvis-spine complex. The absolute and relative position of hip replacement components changes throughout motion of the patient's body. In the case of spinopelvic pathology such as spine stiffness, the system reaches abnormal positional states, as shown with computerized models. The clinical result of such pathologic hip positioning is edge loading, implant impingement, or even joint dislocation. To prevent such complications, surgeons must change the dogma of single correct implant positioning and take into account patients' individualized anatomy and function. It is essential to broaden the standard diagnostics and their anatomical interpretation, and correct the pre-operative surgical planning. The need for correct and personalized implant placement pushes forward the development and adaptation of novel technologies in THR, such as robotics. In this current concepts narrative review, we simplify the spinopelvic biomechanics and pathoanatomy, the relevant anatomical terminology, and the diagnosis and management algorithms most commonly used today.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipPelvisSpineBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansPostoperative Complicationship spine syndromeindividualized cup placementspine stiffnessspinopelvic

Identifiers

PMID37763710
PMCPMC10535821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.