Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37763579›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparison of CrN Coatings Prepared Using High-Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering and Direct Current Magnetron Sputtering.

Heda Bai, Jin Li, Jialai Gao, Jinyang Ni, Yaxiong Bai, Jie Jian, Lin Zhao, Bowen Bai, Zeyun Cai, Jianchao He and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. BiMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Heda BaiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jin LiInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jialai GaoInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jinyang NiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yaxiong BaiInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jie JianInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Lin ZhaoInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Bowen BaiInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zeyun CaiInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jianchao HeInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Hongsheng ChenInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xuesong LengInstitute of Special Environments Physical Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xiangli LiuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China.

Funding

Characteristic Innovation Project of Guangdong Educational Department 2022KTSCX217Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515012411Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2022A1515012119National Natural Science Foundation of China 12005048National Natural Science Foundation of China U22B2064Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20220531095017039Shenzhen Science and Technology Program RCYX20210609103904028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromium Nitride (CrN) coatings have widespread utilization across numerous industrial applications, primarily attributed to their excellent properties. Among the different methods for CrN coating synthesis, direct current magnetron sputtering (DCMS) has been the dominant technique applied. Nonetheless, with the expanded applications of CrN coatings, the need for enhanced mechanical performance is concurrently escalating. High-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS), an innovative coating deposition approach developed over the past three decades, is gaining recognition for its capability of yielding coatings with superior mechanical attributes, thereby drawing significant research interest. Considering that the mechanical performance of a coating is fundamentally governed by its microstructural properties, a comprehensive review of CrN coatings fabricated through both techniques is presented. This review of recent literature aims to embark on an insightful comparison between DCMS and HiPIMS, followed by an examination of the microstructure of CrN coatings fabricated via both techniques. Furthermore, the exploration of the underlying factors contributing to the disparities in mechanical properties observed in CrN coatings is revealed. An assessment of the advantages and potential shortcomings of HiPIMS is discussed, offering insight into CrN coating fabrication.

Indexed as

coatingsCrNdirect current magnetron sputteringhigh power impulse magnetron sputteringirradiation behaviorsmechanicalmicrostructure

Identifiers

PMID37763579
PMCPMC10532976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.