ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Improved Breast Cancer Classification through Combining Transfer Learning and Attention Mechanism.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced breast cancer detection in histopathology images using graph transformer GANs with graph masked modeling and osprey optimization.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- MSWA-ResNet: Multi-Scale Wavelet Attention for Patient-Level and Interpretable Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Histopathological diagnosis of Ovine Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma (OPA) based on ensemble model.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Enhanced Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Multimodal Feature Fusion with Radiomics and Transfer Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Vocal performance evaluation of the intelligent note recognition method based on deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fusing global context with multiscale context for enhanced breast cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characteristics of regional lymph node metastasis in breast cancer and construction of a nomogram model based on ultrasonographic analysis: a retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Bridging Discoveries and Treatments: The New Landscape of Breast Cancer Research.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advanced integration of 2DCNN-GRU model for accurate identification of shockable life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias: a deep learning approach.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Automated wound care by employing a reliable U-Net architecture combined with ResNet feature encoders for monitoring chronic wounds.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Bridging the digital readiness gap in palliative home care: A process to data approach.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer, a leading cause of female mortality worldwide, poses a significant health challenge. Recent advancements in deep learning techniques have revolutionized breast cancer pathology by enabling accurate image classification. Various imaging methods, such as mammography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and biopsies, aid in breast cancer detection. Computer-assisted pathological image classification is of paramount importance for breast cancer diagnosis. This study introduces a novel approach to breast cancer histopathological image classification. It leverages modified pre-trained CNN models and attention mechanisms to enhance model interpretability and robustness, emphasizing localized features and enabling accurate discrimination of complex cases. Our method involves transfer learning with deep CNN models-Xception, VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNet, and DenseNet121-augmented with the convolutional block attention module (CBAM). The pre-trained models are finetuned, and the two CBAM models are incorporated at the end of the pre-trained models. The models are compared to state-of-the-art breast cancer diagnosis approaches and tested for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The confusion matrices are used to evaluate and visualize the results of the compared models. They help in assessing the models' performance. The test accuracy rates for the attention mechanism (AM) using the Xception model on the "BreakHis" breast cancer dataset are encouraging at 99.2% and 99.5%. The test accuracy for DenseNet121 with AMs is 99.6%. The proposed approaches also performed better than previous approaches examined in the related studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.