Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37763232›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Automated Electrodermal Activity and Facial Expression Analysis for Continuous Pain Intensity Monitoring on the X-ITE Pain Database.

Ehsan Othman, Philipp Werner, Frerk Saxen, Ayoub Al-Hamadi, Sascha Gruss, Steffen Walter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ehsan OthmanDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-1897
Philipp WernerDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4762-2926
Frerk SaxenDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Ayoub Al-HamadiDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3632-2402
Sascha GrussDepartment of Medical Psychology, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Steffen WalterDepartment of Medical Psychology, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF)German Academic Exchange ServiceRobo-Lab no. 03ZZ04X02B and526 German Research Foundation (DFG) under grants Al 638/13-1 and Al 638/15-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on improving healthcare quality by introducing an automated system that continuously monitors patient pain intensity. The system analyzes the Electrodermal Activity (EDA) sensor modality modality, compares the results obtained from both EDA and facial expressions modalities, and late fuses EDA and facial expressions modalities. This work extends our previous studies of pain intensity monitoring via an expanded analysis of the two informative methods. The EDA sensor modality and facial expression analysis play a prominent role in pain recognition; the extracted features reflect the patient's responses to different pain levels. Three different approaches were applied: Random Forest (RF) baseline methods, Long-Short Term Memory Network (LSTM), and LSTM with the sample-weighting method (LSTM-SW). Evaluation metrics included Micro average F1-score for classification and Mean Squared Error (MSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [3, 1]) for both classification and regression. The results highlight the effectiveness of late fusion for EDA and facial expressions, particularly in almost balanced datasets (Micro average F1-score around 61%, ICC about 0.35). EDA regression models, particularly LSTM and LSTM-SW, showed superiority in imbalanced datasets and outperformed guessing (where the majority of votes indicate no pain) and baseline methods (RF indicates Random Forest classifier (RFc) and Random Forest regression (RFr)). In conclusion, by integrating both modalities or utilizing EDA, they can provide medical centers with reliable and valuable insights into patients' pain experiences and responses.

Indexed as

continuous pain intensity recognitionelectrodermal activityfacial expressionsfusionlong-short term memory networkrandom forestsample weighting

Identifiers

PMID37763232
PMCPMC10533107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.