Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37763153›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Parcellation-Based Connectivity Model of the Judgement Core.

Jorge Hormovas, Nicholas B Dadario, Si Jie Tang, Peter Nicholas, Vukshitha Dhanaraj, Isabella Young, Stephane Doyen, Michael E Sughrue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge HormovasCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Level 7 Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Nicholas B DadarioRobert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 125 Paterson St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8657-187X
Si Jie TangSchool of Medicine, 21772 University of California Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5136-7353
Peter NicholasOmniscient Neurotechnology, Level 10/580 George Street, Haymarket, NSW 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1088-9072
Vukshitha DhanarajCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Level 7 Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Isabella YoungOmniscient Neurotechnology, Level 10/580 George Street, Haymarket, NSW 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7639-6679
Stephane DoyenOmniscient Neurotechnology, Level 10/580 George Street, Haymarket, NSW 2000, Australia.
Michael E SughrueCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Level 7 Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Prince of Wales Hospital · AURutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Judgement is a higher-order brain function utilized in the evaluation process of problem solving. However, heterogeneity in the task methodology based on the many definitions of judgement and its expansive and nuanced applications have prevented the identification of a unified cortical model at a level of granularity necessary for clinical translation. Forty-six task-based fMRI studies were used to generate activation-likelihood estimations (ALE) across moral, social, risky, and interpersonal judgement paradigms. Cortical parcellations overlapping these ALEs were used to delineate patterns in neurocognitive network engagement for the four judgement tasks. Moral judgement involved the bilateral superior frontal gyri, right temporal gyri, and left parietal lobe. Social judgement demonstrated a left-dominant frontoparietal network with engagement of right-sided temporal limbic regions. Moral and social judgement tasks evoked mutual engagement of the bilateral DMN. Both interpersonal and risk judgement were shown to involve a right-sided frontoparietal network with accompanying engagement of the left insular cortex, converging at the right-sided CEN. Cortical activation in normophysiological judgement function followed two separable patterns involving the large-scale neurocognitive networks. Specifically, the DMN was found to subserve judgement centered around social inferences and moral cognition, while the CEN subserved tasks involving probabilistic reasoning, risk estimation, and strategic contemplation.

Indexed as

brain connectomefMRIjudgementmeta-analysisnetworksneurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID37763153
PMCPMC10532823
OpenAlexW4386814327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.