Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37763039›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Outcomes of CAR-T Cell Therapy Recipients Admitted to the ICU: In Search for a Standard of Care-A Brief Overview and Meta-Analysis of Proportions.

Catalin Constantinescu, Vlad Moisoiu, Bogdan Tigu, David Kegyes, Ciprian Tomuleasa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catalin ConstantinescuDepartment of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-911X
Vlad MoisoiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Bogdan TiguMedfuture Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9397-0791
David KegyesMedfuture Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6252-6281
Ciprian TomuleasaDepartment of Hematology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-1519
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur primary objective was to describe the baseline characteristics, main reasons for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and interventions required in the ICU across patients who received CAR-T cell immunotherapy. The secondary objectives were to evaluate different outcomes (ICU mortality) across patients admitted to the ICU after having received CAR-T cell therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a medical literature review, which included MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library, of studies published from the inception of the databases until 2022. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analyses of proportions of several studies, including CAR-T cell-treated patients who required ICU admission. Outcomes in the meta-analysis were evaluated using the random-effects model.

resultsWe included four studies and analyzed several outcomes, including baseline characteristics and ICU-related findings. CAR-T cell recipients admitted to the ICU are predominantly males (62% CI-95% (57-66)). Of the total CAR-T cell recipients, 4% CI-95% (3-5) die in the hospital, and 6% CI-95% (4-9) of those admitted to the ICU subsequently die. One of the main reasons for ICU admission is acute kidney injury (AKI) in 15% CI-95% (10-19) of cases and acute respiratory failure in 10% CI-95% (6-13) of cases. Regarding the interventions initiated in the ICU, 18% CI-95% (13-22) of the CAR-T recipients required invasive mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay, 23% CI-95% (16-30) required infusion of vasoactive drugs, and 1% CI-95% (0.1-3) required renal replacement therapy (RRT). 18% CI-95% (13-22) of the initially discharged patients were readmitted to the ICU within 30 days, and the mean length of hospital stay is 22 days CI-95% (19-25). The results paint a current state of matter in CAR-T cell recipients admitted to the ICU.

conclusionsTo better understand immunotherapy-related complications from an ICU standpoint, acknowledge the deteriorating patient on the ward, reduce the ICU admission rate, advance ICU care, and improve the outcomes of these patients, a standard of care and research regarding CAR-T cell-based immunotherapies should be created. Studies that are looking from the perspective of intensive care are highly warranted because the available literature regarding this area is scarce.

Indexed as

CAR-T cellchimeric antigen receptor-T cellcritical illnesshematological malignanciesintensive caresepsis

Identifiers

PMID37763039
PMCPMC10531736
OpenAlexW4386912690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.