Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37762985›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Transcultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists.

Ángeles Díaz-Fernández, Ana Raquel Ortega-Martínez, Irene Cortés-Pérez, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Rafael Lomas-Vega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ángeles Díaz-FernándezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5938-8976
Ana Raquel Ortega-MartínezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4336-6593
Irene Cortés-PérezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-1399
Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-VeraDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9103-9696
Esteban Obrero-GaitánDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8430-5500
Rafael Lomas-VegaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2546-6301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the main musculoskeletal pain conditions, and it affects 23-28% of the global population. Strong evidence supports the absence of a direct relationship between the intensity of pain and tissue damage, with psychosocial factors also playing a crucial role. In this context, the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) is a useful tool for evaluating physiotherapists' treatment orientations and beliefs regarding the management of low back pain (LBP). It helps identify practitioners who may benefit from additional education in modern pain neuroscience. However, there is not a Spanish validation of this scale for physiotherapists. Thus, the aims of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) into Spanish and to evaluate its psychometric properties. This validation study used three convenience samples of physiotherapists (PTs) (

Indexed as

attitudebeliefs scalelow back painphysical therapistspsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID37762985
PMCPMC10531514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.