ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Preventing Rejection of the Kidney Transplant.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Triple Immunosuppressive Therapy Induces Profibrotic Changes in the Jejunal Mucosa of Male Rats: A Digital Image Analysis of Collagen Fibers.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Gemcitabine-sirolimus synergy associated thrombotic microangiopathy in a renal transplant recipient with mesenteric leiomyosarcoma: A case report.World journal of transplantation · 2026Article
- Navigating Immunotherapy in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report of POLE-Mutated Jejunal Adenocarcinoma.Cureus · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond graphene: the MXene era in bioprinting.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- CD3+ T-cell count prediction for anti-thymocyte globulin treatment monitorization in kidney transplant recipients: a machine learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors of Acute Rejection: Impact on Graft Outcomes in a Cohort of Kidney Transplant Recipients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Mineralocorticoid receptor blockage in kidney transplantation: too much of a good thing or not?International urology and nephrology · 2025Review
- Endocrine malignancies: a still neglected issue in kidney transplantation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Translational Aspects of 3D and 4D Printing and Bioprinting.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Exploring Costimulatory Blockade-Based Immunologic Strategies in Transplantation: Are They a Promising Immunomodulatory Approach for Organ and Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation?Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing knowledge of immunologic factors and with the advent of potent immunosuppressive agents, the last several decades have seen significantly improved kidney allograft survival. However, despite overall improved short to medium-term allograft survival, long-term allograft outcomes remain unsatisfactory. A large body of literature implicates acute and chronic rejection as independent risk factors for graft loss. In this article, we review measures taken at various stages in the kidney transplant process to minimize the risk of rejection. In the pre-transplant phase, it is imperative to minimize the risk of sensitization, aim for better HLA matching including eplet matching and use desensitization in carefully selected high-risk patients. The peri-transplant phase involves strategies to minimize cold ischemia times, individualize induction immunosuppression and make all efforts for better HLA matching. In the post-transplant phase, the focus should move towards individualizing maintenance immunosuppression and using innovative strategies to increase compliance. Acute rejection episodes are risk factors for significant graft injury and development of chronic rejection thus one should strive for early detection and aggressive treatment. Monitoring for DSA development, especially in high-risk populations, should be made part of transplant follow-up protocols. A host of new biomarkers are now commercially available, and these should be used for early detection of rejection, immunosuppression modulation, prevention of unnecessary biopsies and monitoring response to rejection treatment. There is a strong push needed for the development of new drugs, especially for the management of chronic or resistant rejections, to prolong graft survival. Prevention of rejection is key for the longevity of kidney allografts. This requires a multipronged approach and significant effort on the part of the recipients and transplant centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.