Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37762829›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Effects of Mobilization within 72 h of ICU Admission in Critically Ill Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ayaka Matsuoka, Shodai Yoshihiro, Haruka Shida, Gen Aikawa, Yoshihisa Fujinami, Yusuke Kawamura, Nobuto Nakanishi, Motohiro Shimizu, Shinichi Watanabe, Kensuke Sugimoto and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Exercise therapy for the treatment of delirium in the intensive care unit.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sarcopenia and frailty in critical illness.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ayaka MatsuokaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga City 849-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4383-9132
Shodai YoshihiroDepartment of Pharmacy, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23 Hirahara, Onomichi 722-8508, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2418-2323
Haruka ShidaOffice of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Shin-Kasumigaseki Building, 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyodaku, Tokyo 100-0013, Japan.
Gen AikawaDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Ibaraki Christian University, 6-11-1 Omika, Hitachi 319-1295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7404-5442
Yoshihisa FujinamiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, 439 Kakogawacho Honmachi, Kakogawa 675-8611, Japan.
Yusuke KawamuraDepartment of Rehabilitation, Showa General Hospital, 8-1-1 Hanakoganei, Tokyo 187-8510, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-8728-8902
Nobuto NakanishiDepartment of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2 Kusunoki, Chuo-ward, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2394-2688
Motohiro ShimizuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ryokusen-kai Yonemori Hospital, 1-7-1, Yojiro, Kagoshima 890-0062, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-5579
Shinichi WatanabeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gifu University of Health Science, 2-92, Gifu 500-8281, Japan.
Kensuke SugimotoIntensive Care Unit, Gunma University Hospital; 39-15 Showa, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan.
Shunsuke TaitoScientific Research Works Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka 541-0043, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1218-4225
Shigeaki InoueDepartment of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2 Kusunoki, Chuo-ward, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-8537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that rehabilitation within a week of intensive care unit (ICU) admission benefits physical function in critically ill patients. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aim to clarify effects of initiating rehabilitation within 72 h of ICU admission on long-term physical, cognitive, and mental health. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between April 2019 and November 2022 to add to the previous review. Two investigators independently selected and extracted data. Pooled effect estimates for muscle strength, cognitive function, mental health after discharge, and adverse events were calculated. Evidence certainty was assessed via Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations. Eleven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Early rehabilitation may improve muscle strength (three trials; standard mean difference [SMD], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.04-0.36) and cognitive function (two trials; SMD, 0.54; 95% CI, -0.13-1.20). Contrastingly, early mobilization showed limited impact on mental health or adverse events. In summary, initiating rehabilitation for critically ill patients within 72 h may improve physical and cognitive function to prevent post-intensive care syndrome without increasing adverse events. The effect on mental function remains uncertain.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingcognitive functionintensive care unitmental healthmuscle strengthpost-intensive care syndromequality of life

Identifiers

PMID37762829
PMCPMC10531519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.